Bill Cosby convicted! What about the others?

Cosby1...

SO BILL COSBY IS CONVICTED.  THESE WOMEN SAY HE DRUGGED THEM THEN RAPED THEM.  SOME OF THE CASES ARE OVER TWENTY YEARS OLD. THERE’S NO PHYSICAL EVIDENCE OF RAPE. NO DNA AT ALL. AND MANY OF THE WOMEN LIED ABOUT THEIR STORIES.  YET HE WAS STILL CONVICTED.  DOES ANYONE ELSE FIND THAT STRANGE?  IS THIS JUSTICE? IS COSBY GUILTY? YOU COME TO YOUR OWN CONSCLUSION.  BUT WHAT ABOUT THE REST OF THESE FAMOUS WHITE MEN ACCUSED OF SEX ALLEGATIONS. CHARLIE SHEEN? MATT LAUER? HARVEY WEINSTEIN? WILL THEY SEE DAY IN COURT?  WILL THEY BE CONVICTED? IT’S HIGHLY UNLIKELY. WHAT DO YOU THINK?

Kanye West Decoded: Sellout Coon or Mind Control victim?

IMG_7745

What the hell is going on with rapper/producer Kanye West? He really has changed.I remember after Hurricane Katrina he said President Bush didn’t care about black people.  He got a lot of props from people  for speaking the truth.  Now he’s walking around with a “Make America Great Again” hat and supporting President Donald Trump.  He has completely turned into a different person.  I know people can evolve and change viewpoints.  This is what happens when people elevate their conscious and receive new information.  But this is a BIG change in my opinion.  On a recent live TMZ interview he said that “slavery was a choice”.  That comment has made West a hot topic all over social media.  What made his transform so drastically?  Is it because the fame and fortune is getting to him?  Does too much white vagina make you lose your mind? maybe just being around the demonic Kardashian family is to much for his mental state.  Some believe he might be under mind control.  I have heard about mind control being in Hollywood for decades. He has mad crazy rants before.  So this is not the first time.  But sometimes he speaks the truth about the industry. Here’s some interesting videos breaking down this crazy Kanye situation.  I’d love to hear your thoughts.

MK Ultra...

Kanye3...

Kanye2..

Sexual Misconduct Overload: Witch hunt or Dick hunt?

Guilty1...jpg

Guilty5..

Ove the last few months there are have been many different cases of sexual harassment and misconduct in the news.  One of the first big names was film producer Harvey Weinstein.  He was the head of Miramax films.  He was accused of sexual misconduct by actresses like Angelina Jolie,Ashley Judd,Mira Sorvino,Lupita Nyongo ,Salma Hayek and Gwyneth Paltrow.  But it didn’t stop there.  Other male celebrities were soon called out as well.  Men like Comedian Louis CK,Richard Dreyfuss,Matt Lauer,Charlie Rose,Dustin Hoffman,Jeremy Piven,Sylvester Stallone,Ben Affleck,Tom Sizemore,director James Toback,Steven Seagal,singer Nick Carter,director Bryan Singer,President George Bush and Kevin Spacey.  The relevant names were mostly white men.  But now they seem to be coming after black men as well.  Aside from Bill Cosby,which was awhile back.  Lately  there have been sexual misconduct accusations against television host Tavis Smiley,Def Jam music pioneer Russell Simmons,NFL player Donovan McNabb,NFL player Marshall Faulk among others.

Gulity7...

In this video(above) Tavis Smiley denied the accusations. Russell Simmons also said that he’s innocent and believes he’s being set up.  There is also talk that this is all about attacking divine masculinity energy and replacing it with homosexual and transgenders.  There could be some truth to this.  There are so many accusations coming out it seems very orchestrated. I know racist Hollywood never misses a chance to degrade the black male image.  But the fact that they are doing this to famous white men as well makes me wonder if there’s a larger issue at play.  I know that the Hollywood/music industry is very demonic and satanic.  Many of these powerful men most likely did homosexual acts to get to that level of success.  I highly doubt that the media cares about the mistreatment of women.  In Hollywood the casting couch has existed forever. These big name producers have always told women they had to sleep with them to get big movie parts.  So abuse of power in high places is nothing new. So what is the real agenda?Maybe these rich men have ran out of time. maybe it’s time to pay the piper.  Is this a masonic ritual?  Are the Zionist elite cleaning house?  Did any of these men break an oath?  I’m curious to know your thoughts.

Arabs enslaving Africans: How did this happen?(Graphic pics)

Libya3...

In March 2011, NATO launched a war in Libya expressly aimed at toppling the government of longtime leader Muammar Qadhafi. The US and its allies flew some 26,000 sorties over Libya and launched hundreds of cruise missiles, destroying the government’s ability to resist rebel forces.

US President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, along with their European counterparts, insisted the military intervention was being carried out for humanitarian reasons. But political scientist Micah Zenko (Foreign Policy3/22/16) used NATO’s own materials to show how “the Libyan intervention was about regime change from the very start.”

NATO supported an array of rebel groups fighting on the ground in Libya, many of which were dominated by Islamist extremists and harbored violently racist views. Militants in the NATO-backed rebel stronghold of Misurata even referred to themselves in 2011 as “the brigade for purging slaves, black skin”—an eerie foreshadowing of the horrors that were to come.

The war ended in October 2011. US and European aircraft attacked Qadhafi’s convoy, and he was brutally murdered by extremist rebels—sodomized with a bayonet. Secretary Clinton, who played a decisive role in the war, declared live on CBS News (10/20/11), “We came, we saw, he died!” The Libyan government dissolved soon after.

In the six years since, Libya has been roiled by chaos and bloodshed. Multiple would-be governments are competing for control of the oil-rich country, and in some areas there is still no functioning central authority. Many thousands of people have died, although the true numbers are impossible to verify. Millions of Libyans have been displaced—a staggering number, nearly one-third of the population, had fled to neighboring Tunisia by 2014.

Corporate media, however, have largely forgotten about the key role NATO played in destroying Libya’s government, destabilizing the country and empowering human traffickers.

Moreover, even the few news reports that do acknowledge NATO’s complicity in the chaos in Libya do not go a step further and detail the well-documented, violent racism of the NATO-backed Libyan rebels who ushered in slavery after ethnically cleansing and committing brutal crimes against black Libyans.

Libya4...

The flashy CNN multimedia report included bonuses galore: two videos, two animated gifs, two photos and a chart. But something was missing: The 1,000-word story made no mention of NATO, or the 2011 war that destroyed Libya’s government, or Muammar Qadhafi, or any kind of historical and political context whatsoever.

Despite these huge flaws, the CNN report was widely celebrated, and made an impact in a corporate media apparatus that otherwise cares little about North Africa. A flurry of media reports followed. These stories overwhelmingly spoke of slavery in Libya as an apolitical and timeless human rights issue, not as a political problem rooted in very recent history.

In subsequent stories, when Libyan and United Nations officials announced they would launch an investigation into the slave auctions, CNN (11/17/1711/20/17) again failed to mention the 2011 war, let alone NATO’s role in it.

One CNN report (11/21/17) on a UN Security Council meeting noted, “Ambassadors from Senegal to Sweden also blamed trafficking’s root causes: unstable countries, poverty, profits from slave trading and lack of legal enforcement.” But it failed to explain why Libya is unstable.

Another 1,200-word CNN follow-up article (11/23/17) was just as obfuscatory. It was only in the 35th paragraph of this 36-graf story that a Human Rights Watch researcher noted, “Libyan interim authorities have been dragging their feet on virtually all investigations they supposedly started, yet never concluded, since the 2011 uprising.” NATO’s leadership in this 2011 uprising was, however, ignored.

An Agence France-Presse news wire that was published by Voice of America (11/17/17) and other websites similarly failed to provide any historical context for the political situation in Libya. “Testimony collected by AFP in recent years has revealed a litany of rights abuses at the hands of gang leaders, human traffickers and the Libyan security forces,” the article said, but it did not recount anything that happened before 2017.

Libya5...

In an account of the large protests that erupted outside Libyan embassies in Europe and Africa in response to reports of slave auctions, Reuters (11/20/17) indicated, “Six years after the fall of Muammar Gaddafi, Libya is still a lawless state where armed groups compete for land and resources and people-smuggling networks operate with impunity.” But it did not provide any more information about how Qadhafi was toppled.

A report in the Huffington Post (11/22/17), later republished by AOL (11/27/17), did concede that Libya is “one of the world’s most unstable [sic], mired in conflict since dictator Muammar Gaddafi was ousted and killed in 2011.” It made no mention of NATO’s leadership in that ousting and killing.

Part of the problem has been the unwillingness of international organizations to point out the responsibility of powerful Western governments. In his statement on the reports of slavery in Libya, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres (11/20/17) did not mention anything about what has happened politically inside the North African nation in the past six years. The UN News Centre report (11/20/17) on Guterres’ comments was just as contextless and uninformative, as was the press release (11/21/17) on the issue from the International Organization for Migration.

Al Jazeera (11/26/17) did cite an IOM official who suggested, in Al Jazeera‘s words, that “the international community should pay more attention to post-Gaddafi Libya.” But the media outlet provided no context as to how Libya became post-Qadhafi in the first place. In fact, Al Jazeera‘s source went out of his way to make the issue apolitical: “Modern-day slavery is widespread around the world and Libya is by no means unique.”

While it is true that slavery and human trafficking happen in other countries, this widespread media narrative depoliticizes the problem in Libya, which has its roots in explicit political decisions made by governments and their leaders: namely, the choice to overthrow Libya’s stable government, turning the oil-rich North African nation into a failed state ruled by competing warlords and militias, some of which are involved in and profit from slavery and trafficking.

When Western governments were hoping to militarily intervene in the country in the lead-up to March 19, 2011, there was a constant torrent of media reports on the evils of Qadhafi and his government—including a healthy dose of fake news (Salon9/16/16). Major newspapers staunchly supported the NATO intervention, and made no secret of their pro-war editorial lines.

When the US government and its allies were preparing for war, the corporate media apparatus did what it does best, and helped sell yet another military intervention to the public.

In the years since, on the other hand, there has been exponentially less interest in the disastrous aftermath of that NATO war. There will be short spikes of interest, as there was in early 2017. The most recent spurt of press coverage was inspired by the publication of CNN‘s shocking video footage. But the coverage invariably rapidly peaks and goes away.

Libya6...

The catastrophe Libya might endure after the collapse of its state had been predictable at the time. Qadhafi himself had warned NATO member states, while they were waging war against him, that they were going to unleash chaos throughout the region. Yet Western leaders—Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in the US, David Cameron in the UK, Nicolas Sarkozy in France, Stephen Harper in Canada—ignored Qadhafi’s admonition and violently toppled his government.

Even from the small number of media reports on slavery in Libya that do manage to acknowledge NATO’s responsibility for destabilizing the country, nevertheless, something is still missing.

Looking back at Libya’s anti-Qadhafi rebels, both during and after the 2011 war, it is very clear that hardline anti-black racism was widespread in the NATO-backed opposition. A 2016 investigation by the British House of Common’s Foreign Affairs Committee (Salon9/16/16) acknowledged that “militant Islamist militias played a critical role in the rebellion from February 2011 onwards.” But many rebels were not just fundamentalist; they were also violently racist.

It is unfortunately no surprise that these extremist Libyan militants later enslaved African refugees and migrants: They were hinting at it from the very beginning.

Most American and European media coverage at the time of NATO’s military intervention was decidedly pro-rebel. When reporters got on the ground, however, they began publishing a few more nuanced pieces that hinted at the reality of the opposition. These were insignificant in number, but they are enlightening and worth revisiting.

Three months into the NATO war, in June 2011, the Wall Street Journal‘s Sam Dagher (6/21/11) reported from Misrata, Libya’s third-largest city and a major hub for the opposition, where he noted he saw rebel slogans like “the brigade for purging slaves, black skin.”

Dahger indicated that the rebel stronghold of Misrata was dominated by “tightly knit white merchant families,” whereas “the south of the country, which is predominantly black, mainly backs Col. Gadhafi.”

Other graffiti in Misrata read “Traitors keep out.” By “traitors,” rebels were referring to Libyans from the town of Tawergha, which the Journal explained is “inhabited mostly by black Libyans, a legacy of its 19th-century origins as a transit town in the slave trade.”

Dagher reported that some Libyan rebel leaders were “calling for the expulsion of Tawerghans from the area” and “banning Tawergha natives from ever working, living or sending their children to schools in Misrata.” He added that predominately Tawergha neighborhoods in Misrata had already been emptied. Black Libyans were “gone or in hiding, fearing revenge attacks by Misratans, amid reports of bounties for their capture.”

The rebel commander Ibrahim al-Halbous told the Journal, “Tawergha no longer exists, only Misrata.”

Al-Halbous would later reappear in a report by the Sunday Telegraph (9/11/11), reiterating to the British newspaper, “Tawarga no longer exists.” (When Halbous was injured in September, the New York Times9/20/11—portrayed him sympathetically as a martyr in the heroic fight against Qadhafi. The Halbous brigade has in the years since become an influential militia in Libya.)

Libya7...

Like Dagher, the Telegraph‘s Andrew Gilligan drew attention to the slogan painted on the road between Misrata and Tawergha: “the brigade for purging slaves [and] black skin.”

Gilligan reported from Tawergha, or rather from the remnants of the majority-black town, which he noted had “been emptied of its people, vandalized and partly burned by rebel forces.” A rebel leader said of the dark-skinned residents, “We said if they didn’t go, they would be conquered and imprisoned. Every single one of them has left, and we will never allow them to come back.”

Gilligan noted “a racist undercurrent. Many Tawargas, though neither immigrants nor Gaddafi’s much-ballyhooed African mercenaries, are descended from slaves, and are darker than most Libyans.”

Slavery1...

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization assisted these virulently racist rebels in Misrata. NATO forces frequently launched air attacks on the city. French fighter jets shot down Libyan planes over Misrata. The US and UK fired cruise missiles at Libyan government targets, and the US launched Predator drone strikes. The Canadian air force also attacked Libyan forces, pushing them out of Misrata.

In a public relations video NATO published in May 2011, early in the Libya war, the Western military alliance openly admitted that it intentionally allowed “Libyan rebels to transport arms from Benghazi to Misrata.” Political scientist Micah Zenko (Foreign Policy3/22/16) pointed out the implications of this video: “A NATO surface vessel stationed in the Mediterranean to enforce an arms embargo did exactly the opposite, and NATO was comfortable posting a video demonstrating its hypocrisy.”

Throughout the war and after, Libyan rebels continued carrying out racist sectarian attacks against their black compatriots. These attacks have been well documented by mainstream human rights organizations.

Human Rights Watch’s longtime executive director Kenneth Roth cheered on NATO intervention in Libya in 2011, calling the UN Security Council’s unanimous endorsement of a no-fly zone a “remarkable” confirmation of the so-called “responsibility to protect” doctrine.

Roth’s organization, however, could not ignore the crimes anti-Qadhafi militants committed against dark-skinned Libyans and migrants.

In September 2011, when the war was still ongoing, Human Rights Watch reported on Libyan rebels’ “arbitrary arrests and abuse of African migrant workers and black Libyans assumed to be [pro-Qadhafi] mercenaries.”

Then in October, the top US human rights organization noted that Libyan militias were “terrorizing the displaced residents of the nearby town of Tawergha,” the majority-black community that had been a stronghold of support for Qadhafi. “The entire town of 30,000 people is abandoned—some of it ransacked and burned—and Misrata brigade commanders say the residents of Tawergha should never return,” HRW added. Witnesses “gave credible accounts of some Misrata militias shooting unarmed Tawerghans, and of arbitrary arrests and beatings of Tawerghan detainees, in a few cases leading to death.”

Slavery2..

In 2013, HRW reported further on the ethnic cleansing of the black community of Tawergha. The human rights organization, whose chief had so effusively supported the military intervention, wrote: “The forced displacement of roughly 40,000 people, arbitrary detentions, torture and killings are widespread, systematic and sufficiently organized to be crimes against humanity.”

These atrocities are undeniable, and they lead a path straight to the enslavement of African refugees and migrants. But to acknowledge NATO’s complicity in empowering these racist extremist militants, corporate media would have to acknowledge NATO’s role in the 2011 regime change war in Libya in the first place.

Article by Global Research

Is the NFL protest a psychological operation?(Take a Knee)

Bow2...

There’s a lot of hype right now about the NFL protest.  President Donald Trump said that it’s disrespectful to not stand when the national anthem is being played. Trump said it was unpatriotic. Even Lebron James called Trump a bum after his statements.  Some fans are calling for a NFL boycott. Now the media is running with the story. This all started last year when NFL player Colin Kaepernick decided to sit while the national anthem was being played.  It was all over the mainstream news.  I did a post on it last year. He said he did it to protest police brutality and the killing of unarmed “people of color.” Sounds like a nice gesture,right? But something didn’t set right with me.  I have a very analytical mind and I analyze everything the media puts out.  And you have to use discernment anytime the media gives any event too much attention.  If you see a story over and over again it’s for a purpose. I believe that this was staged from the very beginning by the NFL owners.  I think Kaepernick just went along with it.  It got him some new found fame and a Time magazine cover in the process. He was never on the cover of Time magazine before that. I think the media purposely uses staged events to ramp up more racial tension.  Although we all know that the country is racially divided anyway. But these type of stories help to fan the flames in most cases. I also  don’t think the so-called liberal media cares about the plight of black people.  There’s always some type of deception going on.  But you have to have a keen eye to see it.

Bow3...

Bow1...

I told you in a past post that I believe that the NFL,NBA and MLB owners are Freemasons.  I also believe that most NBA finals,Super Bowls and World Series are planned years in advance.  I know this is hard for most sports fans to accept.  I love watching sports too but I had to face the reality that most things are scripted.  People think it’s just sitcoms,dramas and professional wrestling.  It’s hard for some people to believe that even reality shows are scripted.  People just seem to love the synthetic reality they have been given.  The mainstream media has been feeding us lies forever. The photo(above) is a freemason picture.  It’s called the “entered apprentice”.  It’s for new members into the secret Freemasons.  As you can see he’s bended on one knee.  In the picture is the master,the altar and the lights. The man on the far right is the conductor.  I think these Freemason NFL owners are getting the masses to participate in a mass ritual  They have the public thinking they’re being defiant against Donald Trump.  But the joke is one the public.  These owners are laughing behind the scenes.  They know that most people don’t study masonic rituals,symbolism and the occult.  They think they’re really protesting against something. Maybe there’s a hidden message behind all this.  What if they’re getting all these people to “bow down” to them.  As in bowing down to your master??  Some food for thought. Here’s some of what is said when taking the oath  : “I,(fill in the name), of my own free-will and accord, in the presence of Almighty God(Satan), and this worshipful Lodge, erected to Him, and dedicated to the holy STS. JOHN, 1 do hereby and hereon (Master presses candidate’s hand with the gavel), most solemnly and sincerely promise and swear that I will always hail, and ever conceal, and never reveal any of the secret arts, parts, or points of the Fellow Craft Degree to any person whomsoever, except it be to a true and lawful brother of this degree, or in a regularly constituted Lodge of Fellow Crafts; nor unto him or them until, by strict trial, due examination, or lawful information, I shall find him, or them, as lawfully entitled to the same as I am myself.
I furthermore promise and swear that I will stand to, and abide by, all the laws, rules, and regulations of the Fellow Craft Degree, as far as the same shall come to my knowledge.
Further. I will acknowledge and obey all due signs and summons sent to me from a Lodge of Fellow Crafts, or given me by a brother of that degree, if within the length of my cable-tow.
Further, that I will aid and assist all poor, distressed, worthy Fellow Crafts, knowing them to be such, as far as their necessities may require, and my ability permit, without any injury to myself.
Further, that I will not cheat, wrong, nor defraud a brother of this degree, knowingly, nor supplant him in any of his laudable undertakings.
All this I most solemnly promise and swear with a firm and steadfast resolution to perform the same, without any hesitation, mental reservation, or self-evasion of mind whatever, binding myself under no less penalty than of having my breast torn open(sacrifice) my heart  plucked out, and placed on the highest pinnacle of the temple, there to be devoured by the vultures of the air, should I ever knowingly violate the Fellow Craft obligation. So help me God, and keep me steadfast in the due performance of the same.”

I would assume this is what’s said on the lower levels of Freemasonry. But the higher levels involves the billionaires in the Hollywood,music and sports industry.  They own and control what information the media puts out. These are the people who own police chiefs,senators,judges,governors and even presidents. They have the power to get away with pretty much anything. And I don’t think it’s difficult for them to stay sporting events when they easily start wars around the world.  Staging a Super Bowl is child’s play by comparison. Once you are initiated in these secret societies you can’t break the oath or tell the secrets. And they use protests like this to harvest energy from the public.  These people are deep into the occult and believe they gain power from the energy of others.  So by giving your attention to this NFL protest you’re giving them power.  Well at least that’s what they believe.  The rabbit hole is much deeper than most people realize(real eyes).  You’ve been deceived.

Kneel..

Here’s a picture(above) of one of the Knights of Malta. During a knighting ceremony they would kneel(take a knee) during the ritual of knighthood.  One a side note I heard that the word sword stood for “sacred word”.  As in taking an oath and not sharing the secrets of the scared tradition.

Bow4...

Even poor Stevie Wonder got in on the act. He took a knee earlier this week at the Global Citizen festival. Global Citizen??  Sounds like a New World Order agenda to me.  But I digress.  I’m sure Wonder knows exactly what he’s doing.  Or maybe he’s “blind” to the truth.  So…..what’s your excuse?

Hurricane in Hue’s Town- Hurricane Harvey Aftermath,Harvesting Black people(Part 2)

Hurr3.....JPG

While the entertainment industry has kept everyone’s focus and attention on the fight between Floyd Mayweather and Conor McGregor, along with the Video Music Awards this weekend, and due to the recent impact of Hurricane Harvey — meanwhile, hardly ANY media attention has gone into the draconian laws signed by your government and enacted by your president this week. One of them has to do with reinstitution of the militarization of police… because on Mon., Aug. 28th, 2017, Attorney General Jeff Sessions met with the Fraternal Order of Police at the 63rd Biennial Conference held in Nashville, Tennessee — where the Trump administration quietly lifted the ban on military gear to local police forces… This means that local police officers are allowed to attain surplus military equipment for their respective police departments — and this comes after the rollback of an Obama administrative executive order (Executive Order 13688, linked below), which blocked armored vehicles, large-caliber weapons, ammunition and other heavy equipment from being re-purposed from foreign battlefields to America’s streets. But now, such bans are no longer restricted.

Hurr6.....

Funding is also provided thru the Department of Defense (DOD) and their 1033 Program — permitting the Secretary of Defense to transfer, without charge, excess U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) personal property (supplies and equipment) to state and local law enforcement agencies (LEAs). This program also allows law enforcement agencies to acquire vehicles (land, air and sea), weapons, computer equipment, fingerprint equipment, night vision equipment, radios and televisions, first aid equipment, tents and sleeping bags, photographic equipment and more. And if that wasn’t bad enough, Congress also passed another draconian law that Trump quietly signed into office, and that is House Joint Resolution 76 at the 115th Congress… This became law as of Tue., Aug. 22nd, 2017, and this resolution allows for the warrantless searches of homes, where only 1% opposed. Just in time for the National Guard and local police force to raid the flooded streets of Texas due to Hurricane Harvey…

Not to mention how these draconian laws were signed and enacted around the EXACT same time as Hurricane Harvey, DAYS before the FEMA National Preparedness Month that will take place in September 2017, and DAYS following the international EarthEx 2017 drill that took place as of Wed., Aug. 23rd, 2017… barely DAYS following the total solar eclipse over America on Mon., Aug. 21st, 2017. Now that the local law enforcement agencies (LEAs) no longer needs a warrant to search your home, and now that LEAs are militarizing and mobilizing like never before — the question still remains: What Are They Getting Ready For?!?!