Are Latinas a better alternative to black women? What about Asian women? The video(above) is of two buffoonish black men speaking on their love of Mexican women. I found the video very distasteful and full of self hatred. These two clowns don’t know how foolish they look. At one point in the video the guy says “Every black man’s dream is to be with a Hispanic girl”. Is he serious? Their self hatred is deep! But I see this type of mentality all the time in California. There is a lot of interracial dating/marriage out here. And I am sick of seeing this hatred of blackness. I have co-workers who chase after Latinas and Asian women all the time. These stupid black men love to brag about getting some “hot Latina ass”. It’s really disgusting. And the media helps to push this interracial crap on the minds of black people. The two guys in this video are at least honest,I will give them that. But I cant stand the black coons that try to deny their anti-blackness and hatred for African women. I think many of them seek validation from these women because they don’t value black women. They are self loathing and devalue blackness. And I’ve seen an increase of black men hooking up with Hispanic/Latinas and Asian women over the last ten years. Even many men in the entertainment and sports world.
Who can forget music producer Puff Daddy and actress Jennifer Lopez. I still think she just used him to get more fame and recognition. After she got more notoriety…she dumped him. What a surprise!
Comedian Dave Chappelle with Filipino wife Elaine and children.
NFL player Champ Bailey with wife Mexican booty model Jesikah Maximus. They have one child together.Why are these fools marrying booty models anyway? These women are fake,plastic,materialistic and have no substance. But guys like Bailey don’t care. Just as long as the woman is not black,that’s all that matters. Having children with non-black genetics is very important to these self hating clowns.
This video(above) is very hard to watch. This black man is a damn fool! This clown goes on about how Filipino women wont give him a chance. He says they usually stick to their own race or get with white men. Wow!! What a shock moron!!! We live in a white dominated society so of course most Asian women worship white men. This video is the definition of pathetic. This is a bad look for black men. This man is literally begging other races of women to love him. He must have NO self respect or dignity. No pride what so ever. I can’t believe he would actually show his face . This fool has other videos talking about how beautiful East Indian woman are and how they diss him. Here’s an idea..why not try black women? Why not embrace the beauty of your African women? But this guy is a Hebrew Isrealite and many of them hate African people. I understand that not all Hebrews think that way. But this guy is utterly ridiculous. So he is full of self hatred and is useless to black people. I hope this coon finds himself a non-black woman so he can breed his kind out of existence. The sooner the better.
Actor Derek Luke and Latina wife Sophia.
NFL player Julius Peppers recently had a baby with Cuban girlfriend Claudia Sampedro. She is a Kim Kardashian look alike to me. Which is fitting since she’s one of these Instagram attention whores dying to get fame. I guess Julius was the sucker!!
Films like Honey(2003) promoted black men-Hispanic women hookups. This film starred Jessica Alba and Mekhi Phifer.
On the drama Grey’s Anatomy (2005-2007) actor Isaiah Washington had a romance with Asian actress Sandra Oh. Television shows and films like this push the idea that black men should go for Asian and Hispanic women.
In the Christian drama film,I’m in Love with a Church Girl(2013) actor/rapper Ja Rule plays a drug dealer that falls in love with a church girl. The woman is played by Latina singer/actress Adrienne Bailon. Neither one of them are great actors. The film is really cheesy with bad acting. But it did accomplish two things. It helped promoted the stereotype of black men as drug dealing criminals. But also helped push the interracial agenda that only a non-black woman can make a black man turn his life around for the better.
On the hit drama Power(2014-present) there is an interracial affair going on. The lead actor Omari Hardwick plays Ghost. Ghost is a New York nightclub owner. But he’s living a double life. He is also a drug dealer on the side. His black wife is played by actress Naturi Naughton. But Ghost is having an affair with his mistress Angela. Angela is played by Mexican actress Lena Loren. A black man cheating on his wife with a Hispanic woman. This season he actually leaves his wife for her. What type of message does this send? Not a good one.
This video(above) is the trailer for the film Bazodee(2016). The plot for this film says :
“Anita Ponchouri(Natalie Perera), the dutiful Indian daughter of a deep-in-debt businessman is about to marry a wealthy Londoner when a chance encounter with local singer, Lee de Leon(Machel Montano) sets things askew. In search of a muse, de Leon agrees to perform at the engagement party for both families. Unable to deny their mutual attraction, and with the excitement of Carnival approaching, Anita must now choose between the answer to her family’s financial prayers and the possibility of real love. Set on the vivid, colorful island of Trinidad and pulsing with the sensuous dance rhythms of soca music.” So now Bollywood is jumping on the interracial trend too?? This is laughable. Indian people are very anti-black for the most part. I have had black men tell me they get no play from Indian women. And that’s saying a lot being in California. Since most people out here are down with race mixing. I’ve seen black men with white,Asian,Puerto rican and Mexican women. I may have seen a black man with an Indian woman maybe once ten years ago…haven’t seen one since. The anti-blackness is very strong in Indan culture. Many of them are very dark skinned but still think they’re better than black/African people. It comes from the color caste system they have. That’s why this Caribbean/Bollywood love story is a joke. No Indian man wants to see his daughter with a black man. He would probably disown her on the spot! These type of films give self-hating black men false hope. They see all these films and television shows promoting interracial marriage and makes them think they can get these type of women. And even the sports athletes can get them only because they are rich. But these dumb negroes don’t understand they will be giving that wealth back to a non-black family. We need to see the value in black women. We need to see the value in having black children and stop making mixed babies. The truth is black men don’t need validation from these women. We should be uplifting the beauty of our own women. Only a self hating loser would chase after Asian,Hispanic and Indian women. There’s nothing wrong with wanting validation. We all need it to a certain extent. But validation should come from getting respect from your own family and community. So I hope all the intelligent and proud black men know where I’m coming from. Peace.
The image of the black woman is under serious attack. It has always been that way for African people. Under the system of white supremacy all things black and African looking must be degraded and made to look “less than”. It has been this way for us since we have been in contact with Europeans. The image of black men is horrible as well. Black men are seen as lazy,pimps,drug dealers and dead beat dads. And the media helps to perpetuate these negative images. For black women in many ways it’s worse. Of course all things are usually worse for women in a male dominated society. But for women their value usually is assigned to their beauty. Of course this is no fault of their own. But I don’t believe that the true worth of a woman is her physical attributes. There are many other qualities that give a woman her worth other than a pretty face or nice body. In this white dominated culture white women are seen as the prettiest. If a white woman has blonde hair and blue eyes she is seen as the romantic(Roman=European) ideal.
There is extreme color stratification in America and abroad. Since white supremacy is global,many other races are brainwashed into believing that anyone with light skin is better than anyone dark skin. This is why many Hispanics and Asians worship light skin people in their race. Skin bleaching is very popular in places Asian and Latin countries. The bleaching cream is flying off the shelves. Everyone is in a quest to get as light as they can be.
Which is why this woman(above pic) would do this to herself. She was already a beautiful women before. Why destroy such beautiful melanin-rich skin? It’s because we live in a world that devalues dark skin and especially dark skinned women. There are many beautiful dark skinned women I’ve met throughout my life. But in the media their beauty is not recognized by this racist society. Hollywood would rather uplift the beauty of light skinned Hispanics or Asian women over black women. Many dark skinned women feel as though they are not properly represented… and they’re right. The African woman was the standard of beauty for thousands of years. It’s only under this current racist system that things are different. No other race of women came close. This is why the media must perpetuate the lie that white women are supreme. Black women have the better body by a mile. Who else comes close? Many Puerto Rican,Cuban and Colombian women have nice bodies but they get it from the African woman anyway. Asian woman are no comparison either. Many Asian women are shaped like little teenage boys. And white women have no hips,thighs or butt. And the black woman ages better than all of them put together. What about hair? Our hair is the hair of the original people of this planet. Our hair curls and rises up to the Sun. Hair is not supposed to lay flat and lifeless. We have hair…everyone else has fur. So black women hold your head up high. Don’t let them shame you about wearing weaves or saying it’s nappy. Non-black women always talk about black women’s hair because the black woman has them beat in ALL categories. I’ve covered the beauty of our hair in a past post. In the video below Rashida Strober explains her insecurities she’s had being dark skinned. And how she copes with colorstruck black men. She doesn’t hold back and never bites her tongue! She cuts right to the chase.
I’ve also noticed that the darker the woman is the better she ages. That deep dark chocolate melanin is so beautiful and powerful. This is why all these albino mutants hate on the black woman. They want to degrade her and call her ugly and nappy-headed. When in reality they know it’s all lies and they’re really jealous. In this racist system they must lie to us and insult the Black Queen and uplift the white whore. This is why the media is always giving airtime to Kim Kardashian and Iggy Azalea. These are talentless white tramps but they get a pass because they have sex with black men. They get no pass from me. And black men need to wake up and stop giving these tramps props. They are nothing but imitation black women. And these biracial woman are also being used as the “ideal black woman”. These white media puts way too many biracial/mixed women in commercials,sitcoms and films. I can count on one hand how many black women who are not biracial that appear on a sitcom or drama. This is all done to keep the dark skinned black woman invisible. They put white,Mexican,Indian,Puerto Rican,Asian women…all ahead of the dark skinned African looking woman. And this is why you have these sellout black entertainers who run out and marry some non-black woman so much. They want to be given props for having a beautiful woman that society will accept. That’s why you can tell a lot about a man by who he chooses to marry. And the African woman is considered the ugliest and most unattractive woman in the world. And this is the way the white racists want things to be. But I reject all their lies. The dark skinned black woman must be respected and uplifted. And black men need to set the standard and stop following the standards of other races. If your standard of beauty is the same as a white man…how are you any different than him? The dark skinned woman is the mother to us all. That’s a fact. Whether you like it or not. The dark skinned woman reminds them of Mother Africa. Which we have been taught to hate therefore her presence offends the brainwashed. We don’t want to be reminded of where we come from. And no one respects a race of people who disrespects their mother. So you look like a fool calling a dark skinned woman tar baby,blackie,dark as night,nappy headed hoe,pitch black and ugly. She is a reflection of you. So when you diss her…..you’re dissing yourself. Keep your head up sistas!
This post is written by blogger Lumumba Afrika. He makes a very strong argument about why the “one drop rule” is outdated. This is a belief that is catching on as many black people realize that they are not benefitting from this belief. A belief that was started by white people during slavery. We have accepted their pseudoscience as though it is the gospel truth. Is the one drip rule outdated? Is this pseudoscience? Do you think it’s a form of colorism? The video is by YouTube/blogger Bhekizitha. Read the post and watch the video and let me know your thoughts.
It took me a year to finally accept this conclusion. I had an argument with a YouTuber concerning this issue in reference to a video he posted entitled “Just because you got black in you.” He proceeded to say that racially mixed people (i.e. people with parents from two distinctly different racial groups with one being Black/Afrikan) are not Afrikan and I predictably had an emotional argument referencing the systematic rape that occurred to Afrikans perpetrated by whites (Europeans) in the USA which resulted in the wider spectrum of skin colour seen in the Afrikan population in the US today. However, after failing to convince him and unsubscribing from his channel, I had several months to listen to interviews and read a lot of material, historical, biological, sociological, and political. I eventually reached the conclusion that indeed he is correct. Hybridized people are not Afrikan and should not be accepted as such.
Before you throw around the term “racist”, let me define the term as per my understanding, The terms “racism” and “racist” are actually misnomers. The phenomena should more accurately be termed “ethnocentric economic protectionism for the purposes of seeking, securing and wielding wealth and power”. Understandably, with this more accurate term, it is more convenient for the “racists” to use the former terminology because it deftly conceals the true nature of the phenomenon and makes confused, naive, and unsuspecting people believe that “anyone can be racist” because they treat someone of another race or more appropriately termed “geno-cultural group” (Baruti, 2006), rudely or make disparaging comments about them. Moreover, the more academically accepted terms “white supremacists” and “white supremacy” are actually not a correct terms either, although from a eurocentric point of view these terms do surreptitiously stimulate the “utamaroho” (Ani, 1994), of Europeans and people classified as white, these terms are nevertheless used to describe the phenomenon in critical race theory and other fields of study. The appropriate terms are actually either “white world domination by terror” (Kambon, 2006) or “white hegemony”. This is an ideology that holds that whites are better, smarter, and more capable producers and managers of wealth than non-white people, and specifically those categorized as black. Hence it justifies by any means necessary the total destruction of any successful model of development independent of whites or without white people leading, organizing and directing it. The logic of this racial hierarchical model proceeds downward with each racial group being more adept at this activity than the lower caste. This ideology informs the system of “white supremacy” that is presently masquerading as globalism. Therefore, it is impossible for a non-white victim (and especially Afrikans) of this system to be a racist, practice racism, be a white supremacist, white hegemonist, or participate in white ethnocentric economic protectionism or “white world domination by terror” in any way that ultimately benefits his or her existence within his or her geno-cultural group and the group as a whole entity as such.
So back to why mulattoes are not Afrikan. Firstly, I would like to posit the view that mulattoes are genome terminator entities, meaning that they can’t reproduce themselves like their respective parents can if they had have mated with one of their own geno-cultural group. A mulatto must mate with another mulatto to reproduce themselves or else their offspring reverts back towards whichever geno-cultural group they have chosen to mate with or they create another hybridised offspring should they decide to mate with another hybridised person or someone from a geno-cultural group which is not one of their parents. Hence their genome pattern cannot maintain structural integrity and they terminate. This is actually the strongest argument for why mulattoes are not Afrikan. Every other geno-cultural group on the planet knows this including the hybridised groups such as the Arabs. The Hispanic/Latinos are another matter which I will address later. I won’t discuss the Indians of South Asia (see the talk by Dr. Velu Annamalai – “Dali: The Black Untouchables of India” on YouTube) but one could reasonably compare my discussion below of the Hispanic/Latinos with that of the Indians, although it is not entirely the same. Other geno-cultural groups never accept a hybrid as one of them. This DOES NOT mean that they treat the hybrid unkindly or should do so in all cases, nor does it mean that the hybrid cannot participate in economic or educational opportunities. However, at the level of strategic power in which the lives and destiny of the geno-cultural group are at stake, hybrids have no place, no relevant voice in matters such as these as they are not part of the geno-cultural group’s GENETIC survival. This is an error that Afrikan people have made. They have assumed that because of “racist” practices of other geno-cultural groups to cast off their hybrids among us, even when they have been created but not fully accepted among the ranks of others, and furthermore the other groups made rules about why they have done so, (i.e. the one drop rule), we have felt an obligation to accept them which has resulted in a non-exclusive preachment befalling the Afrikan geno-cultural group. This failure to address who is Afrikan and who is not has left us vulnerable to infiltration, not only by hybrids, but by non-Afrikans under the false claim that they are too Afrikan because they were either born on the Afrikan continent, they have some distant ancestor who participated in or was raped into producing a hybrid, or they cling to an as yet unproven theory of the “out of Afrika hypothesis” of human origin founded with the propagation of Darwin’s THEORY of evolution. This has left Afrikan people without a codified set of standards, rules and regulations about who is an Afrikan and has exposed us to confused mulattoes seeking a constituency and other unscrupulous interlopers seeking to dominate us.
It was part of racist practices of our enemies to create a one-drop rule. White men did it so they wouldn’t have to legally and formally acknowledge the offspring they had as a result of raping Afrikan women and mulattoes. In fact, I would submit that non-Afrikans who pursue sexual relations with Afrikan people are practicing ethnocentric economic protectionism by way of furthering the social hegemonic aspect of this system, albeit it in a vulgar, perverted, and insidiously biologically destructive way. These people know full well that at present Afrikan people are the least respected geno-cultural group on the planet, so they are seeking to fulfill a need to feel superior to someone through a sexual encounter (which is one of the most vulnerable situations, psychologically and spiritually, a victim of this assault can engage in) which is done most likely due to a sense of inferiority in the non-Afrikan’s own geno-cultural group, or the perpetrators are inherently lustful and perverted and seek to satisfy carnal sexual fetishes at the expense of the non-geno-cultural other, in this case the Afrikan.
The Afrikan geno-cultural group is under no obligation through this behaviour to “accept” mulatto offspring as part of our geno-cultural group anymore than other geno-cultures. It is due to our relative powerlessness and refusal to strictly define who is an Afrikan that has lead to this confusion. Afrikans as part of our liberation and industrial renaissance of Afrikan civilisation, must codify and institutionalise a valid definition of who is an Afrikan. I would suggest reading Chinweizu’s discussion of the “mirror test” for some insight into this matter (Chinweizu, 2006).
Now concerning the so-called Hispanics or Latinos. The term Hispanic simply means a person who speaks Spanish. It is not a racial classification. Therefore, since Spain is in Europe, Hispanics are primarily European white people. The victims of the conquistadors, who were forced to speak the language are largely the remnants of the indigenous nations which were extant in the Americas prior to invasion from Europe. There has been massive hybridization due to the forced rape practiced by the Europeans and the voluntary rape that results from having been conquered wherein both women and men seek to relate in an intimate way with the geno-cultural group that represents power and control in the imposed society. Latino is a Spanish word that means Latin. Latin is another now defunct language that was spoken in Europe. So the two terms to refer to this group are European languages in origin which have nothing to do with the heritage culture of the preponderance of people in the Americas that these terms indicate. Latin or Latino is used because that was the language of the political theological institution (the Catholic Church) used to repress the minds and cultural rituals of the victims of the colonial enterprise in order to make a more docile population able to be exploited efficiently. Detractors or rebels of the theological doctrine were tortured or killed, so this created a fervent adherence to the religion closely intertwined with one’s own survival which we still see presently. Today in this population, since those people who speak Spanish in the Americas are from various origins (i.e. Afrika, Europe, and indigenous American nations), it cannot be said that these people are a distinct race. In fact the archetypical “Latino” or “Hispanic” is actually a hybridised person who is conditioned in a false consciousness to identify with the colonial culture that was cultivated by European settler-conquerors. Within this group there are still enclaves that have retained their indigenous language and cultural practices, but for racist reasons they are labeled as “Latino/Hispanic” to again stimulate the utamaroho of the European descendants and immigrants that are interspersed in this population, so that they feel a sense of comfort knowing that the language still reflects their own worldview and identity. The majority of the hybrids in this population are victims, and some have reproduced to the degree that they can be considered a distinct geno-cultural group or race, but they have not as yet organized themselves in such a manner mainly because they are still prisoners of the European colonial social construct. Additionally, given the imperial reliance on their economic activity as a source for raw materials, cheap labor, and consumption markets, they are victimized economically and therefore cannot undertake the necessary steps to develop themselves in this way. Moreover, they still have confused Afrikans (who are decedents of enslaved Afrikans and are still repressed by both the hybrids, and Europeans) suffering from a false consciousness within their midst, as well as Europeans that are desperately trying to maintain their colonial relationship and keep enact their white hegemonist system of exploitation. Therefore, the people known as “Hispanic/Latinos” contain people on the spectrum of hybridised individuals, culturally mis-oriented Afrikans, indigenous nationals, and criminal Europeans attempting to persist in the maintenance of the monstrosity they have created.
On the other hand the Arabs have been able to organize themselves into a geno-cultural group. This was largely done 1400 years ago through the development of their own political theological institution known as Islam which is simply Arab Christianity (Popp, 2010). Even though there are hybrids contained in the Arab population, they are either historical hybrids produced in antiquity when these white groups invaded Kemet (Egypt) and created offspring with Afrikan women, or they are offspring of the degenerate Arabs that have kidnapped Afrikan women in the present era and used them for their perverted pleasure as sex slaves. The hybrids they create are used to oppress Afrikans in Afrika and promote the expansion of Arab nationalism (i.e. Islam), even though these hybrids are repressed and discriminated as not really being Arabs themselves. It is a psychological phenomenon that is a result of both hybridization and power relationships being enforced by the Arabs on their Black Afrikan victims which compels the hybrids’ fealty to the white Arab dominators. The hybrids see the true Afrikans as powerless so even though they are mistreated by their fathers’ geno-cultural group, they feel the power that is available and the superior social and economic position they have as Arab identified hybrids, gives them the motivation to mistreat the Afrikans in a brutal way for their fathers’ people. So since these two groups, the Arabs and Hispanic/Latinos, are organised for white power and whites have used sexual predatory practices to attack their victims and consolidate their control, it does not mean that the hybrids are white, nor does it mean that their non-white status is a basis of solidarity with Afrikans. This is a MAJOR historical point that Afrikans have missed, refuse to accept, or have been deliberately mis-educated from knowing. The multiplicity of these factors has brought about the MASSIVE confusion about this matter. The subject is so sensitive that to even broach the topic with many Afrikans will result in emotional outbursts and vicious name-calling instead of calm deliberation and effective implementation of the proper provisions that would protect Afrikans from being used as the world’s sexual toilet and dumping ground.
Lastly, and this is a radical position, I don’t think that Afrikans and Europeans, or for that matter other geno-cultural groups, are the same “species”. Now before you levy a charge of “Eugenics”, I am arguing that the criteria and hence the definition of “THE human species” is incorrect and specifically culturally derived from European culturally structured thought (Ani, 1994) to serve political purposes and a quest for power. One of the main criterion for Europeans arguing that now (after several previous theories about the sub-human status of Afrikans and other races) humans are one species and there is “no such thing as race” is that different geno-cultural groups or these “non-existent races” can breed with one another, hence if two biological entities can procreate together it supports the likelihood that they are part of the same species, whereas if two biological entities cannot breed, for example a cat and a bird, then they are two different species. This notion is absolutely absurd. I think far too much emphasis has been placed on the breeding criterion and fact that whites and blacks for instance can have hybrid children and therefore, there is no difference other than skin colour between us and subsequently, we should then “not see colour” and accept all as human. This directive notwithstanding, in the Afrikan worldview and traditional Afrikan societies, Afrikans never posited the idea that people were “born human”. Human beings had to be developed through education and socialisation, and upon successful completion of this process, then the status of human was imparted upon an individual within the Afrikan socio-cultural context. (Baruti, 2002, 2003, 2006, 2009) It was not simply bestowed because one was born of a homo sapiens male and female. This is a distinct difference that exposes the cultural nature of Europeans’ scientific classification and purposes. Basically, I am arguing that Afrikans, Europeans, Asians, Amerindians, and other hybridised people constitute different species of the human “family”. The word “family” in this sense is of a biological grouping, not the emotionally laden image of mom and hugs from your grandmother that the colloquial use of the term “family” generates. I am not arguing for some “shiny happy people” view of humans on earth or that we should all start holding hands and be blind to the different interests of these geno-cultural groups and their different destinies. It is quite obvious that the Amerindian nation of North America had a decidedly different destiny than say the “Sinic” East Asians, so I purport that this fact is still present today, although hidden under universalist and globalist rhetoric. The main point is that if two species or types of humans from two separate and distant geno-cultural groups procreate, it stands to logic that the offspring is neither one or the other geno-cultural group, and thereby constitutes a new geno-cultural entity that must proceed to either develop a cohesive group with other hybrids, or must “disappear” back into one or the other parent’s geno-cultural group. Azania and its “coloured” population is a stark example of this phenomenon, as are the Arabs and Hispanic/Latinos, although to a lesser degree, that I mentioned before. Nevertheless, I will not take time now to argue whether or not the Afrikan parentage of humanity is valid, but suffice it to say that the present definitive difference in geno-cultures will remain until one or more are exterminated by another (which I am not advocating, but is nonetheless a possibility). So, under these conditions, for Afrikans to help promote and accelerate this process by claiming that all hybrids with one Afrikan parent are Afrikan and are not either a separate geno-cultural group, or are not Afrikan and are part of the other parent’s geno-cultural group, (because hopefully at some point we will have the consciousness and power of definition to codify and implement this idea into reality) is a recipe for extinction and assisted genocide.
Article written by Lumumba Afrika