Arabs enslaving Africans: How did this happen?(Graphic pics)

Libya3...

In March 2011, NATO launched a war in Libya expressly aimed at toppling the government of longtime leader Muammar Qadhafi. The US and its allies flew some 26,000 sorties over Libya and launched hundreds of cruise missiles, destroying the government’s ability to resist rebel forces.

US President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, along with their European counterparts, insisted the military intervention was being carried out for humanitarian reasons. But political scientist Micah Zenko (Foreign Policy3/22/16) used NATO’s own materials to show how “the Libyan intervention was about regime change from the very start.”

NATO supported an array of rebel groups fighting on the ground in Libya, many of which were dominated by Islamist extremists and harbored violently racist views. Militants in the NATO-backed rebel stronghold of Misurata even referred to themselves in 2011 as “the brigade for purging slaves, black skin”—an eerie foreshadowing of the horrors that were to come.

The war ended in October 2011. US and European aircraft attacked Qadhafi’s convoy, and he was brutally murdered by extremist rebels—sodomized with a bayonet. Secretary Clinton, who played a decisive role in the war, declared live on CBS News (10/20/11), “We came, we saw, he died!” The Libyan government dissolved soon after.

In the six years since, Libya has been roiled by chaos and bloodshed. Multiple would-be governments are competing for control of the oil-rich country, and in some areas there is still no functioning central authority. Many thousands of people have died, although the true numbers are impossible to verify. Millions of Libyans have been displaced—a staggering number, nearly one-third of the population, had fled to neighboring Tunisia by 2014.

Corporate media, however, have largely forgotten about the key role NATO played in destroying Libya’s government, destabilizing the country and empowering human traffickers.

Moreover, even the few news reports that do acknowledge NATO’s complicity in the chaos in Libya do not go a step further and detail the well-documented, violent racism of the NATO-backed Libyan rebels who ushered in slavery after ethnically cleansing and committing brutal crimes against black Libyans.

Libya4...

The flashy CNN multimedia report included bonuses galore: two videos, two animated gifs, two photos and a chart. But something was missing: The 1,000-word story made no mention of NATO, or the 2011 war that destroyed Libya’s government, or Muammar Qadhafi, or any kind of historical and political context whatsoever.

Despite these huge flaws, the CNN report was widely celebrated, and made an impact in a corporate media apparatus that otherwise cares little about North Africa. A flurry of media reports followed. These stories overwhelmingly spoke of slavery in Libya as an apolitical and timeless human rights issue, not as a political problem rooted in very recent history.

In subsequent stories, when Libyan and United Nations officials announced they would launch an investigation into the slave auctions, CNN (11/17/1711/20/17) again failed to mention the 2011 war, let alone NATO’s role in it.

One CNN report (11/21/17) on a UN Security Council meeting noted, “Ambassadors from Senegal to Sweden also blamed trafficking’s root causes: unstable countries, poverty, profits from slave trading and lack of legal enforcement.” But it failed to explain why Libya is unstable.

Another 1,200-word CNN follow-up article (11/23/17) was just as obfuscatory. It was only in the 35th paragraph of this 36-graf story that a Human Rights Watch researcher noted, “Libyan interim authorities have been dragging their feet on virtually all investigations they supposedly started, yet never concluded, since the 2011 uprising.” NATO’s leadership in this 2011 uprising was, however, ignored.

An Agence France-Presse news wire that was published by Voice of America (11/17/17) and other websites similarly failed to provide any historical context for the political situation in Libya. “Testimony collected by AFP in recent years has revealed a litany of rights abuses at the hands of gang leaders, human traffickers and the Libyan security forces,” the article said, but it did not recount anything that happened before 2017.

Libya5...

In an account of the large protests that erupted outside Libyan embassies in Europe and Africa in response to reports of slave auctions, Reuters (11/20/17) indicated, “Six years after the fall of Muammar Gaddafi, Libya is still a lawless state where armed groups compete for land and resources and people-smuggling networks operate with impunity.” But it did not provide any more information about how Qadhafi was toppled.

A report in the Huffington Post (11/22/17), later republished by AOL (11/27/17), did concede that Libya is “one of the world’s most unstable [sic], mired in conflict since dictator Muammar Gaddafi was ousted and killed in 2011.” It made no mention of NATO’s leadership in that ousting and killing.

Part of the problem has been the unwillingness of international organizations to point out the responsibility of powerful Western governments. In his statement on the reports of slavery in Libya, United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres (11/20/17) did not mention anything about what has happened politically inside the North African nation in the past six years. The UN News Centre report (11/20/17) on Guterres’ comments was just as contextless and uninformative, as was the press release (11/21/17) on the issue from the International Organization for Migration.

Al Jazeera (11/26/17) did cite an IOM official who suggested, in Al Jazeera‘s words, that “the international community should pay more attention to post-Gaddafi Libya.” But the media outlet provided no context as to how Libya became post-Qadhafi in the first place. In fact, Al Jazeera‘s source went out of his way to make the issue apolitical: “Modern-day slavery is widespread around the world and Libya is by no means unique.”

While it is true that slavery and human trafficking happen in other countries, this widespread media narrative depoliticizes the problem in Libya, which has its roots in explicit political decisions made by governments and their leaders: namely, the choice to overthrow Libya’s stable government, turning the oil-rich North African nation into a failed state ruled by competing warlords and militias, some of which are involved in and profit from slavery and trafficking.

When Western governments were hoping to militarily intervene in the country in the lead-up to March 19, 2011, there was a constant torrent of media reports on the evils of Qadhafi and his government—including a healthy dose of fake news (Salon9/16/16). Major newspapers staunchly supported the NATO intervention, and made no secret of their pro-war editorial lines.

When the US government and its allies were preparing for war, the corporate media apparatus did what it does best, and helped sell yet another military intervention to the public.

In the years since, on the other hand, there has been exponentially less interest in the disastrous aftermath of that NATO war. There will be short spikes of interest, as there was in early 2017. The most recent spurt of press coverage was inspired by the publication of CNN‘s shocking video footage. But the coverage invariably rapidly peaks and goes away.

Libya6...

The catastrophe Libya might endure after the collapse of its state had been predictable at the time. Qadhafi himself had warned NATO member states, while they were waging war against him, that they were going to unleash chaos throughout the region. Yet Western leaders—Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton in the US, David Cameron in the UK, Nicolas Sarkozy in France, Stephen Harper in Canada—ignored Qadhafi’s admonition and violently toppled his government.

Even from the small number of media reports on slavery in Libya that do manage to acknowledge NATO’s responsibility for destabilizing the country, nevertheless, something is still missing.

Looking back at Libya’s anti-Qadhafi rebels, both during and after the 2011 war, it is very clear that hardline anti-black racism was widespread in the NATO-backed opposition. A 2016 investigation by the British House of Common’s Foreign Affairs Committee (Salon9/16/16) acknowledged that “militant Islamist militias played a critical role in the rebellion from February 2011 onwards.” But many rebels were not just fundamentalist; they were also violently racist.

It is unfortunately no surprise that these extremist Libyan militants later enslaved African refugees and migrants: They were hinting at it from the very beginning.

Most American and European media coverage at the time of NATO’s military intervention was decidedly pro-rebel. When reporters got on the ground, however, they began publishing a few more nuanced pieces that hinted at the reality of the opposition. These were insignificant in number, but they are enlightening and worth revisiting.

Three months into the NATO war, in June 2011, the Wall Street Journal‘s Sam Dagher (6/21/11) reported from Misrata, Libya’s third-largest city and a major hub for the opposition, where he noted he saw rebel slogans like “the brigade for purging slaves, black skin.”

Dahger indicated that the rebel stronghold of Misrata was dominated by “tightly knit white merchant families,” whereas “the south of the country, which is predominantly black, mainly backs Col. Gadhafi.”

Other graffiti in Misrata read “Traitors keep out.” By “traitors,” rebels were referring to Libyans from the town of Tawergha, which the Journal explained is “inhabited mostly by black Libyans, a legacy of its 19th-century origins as a transit town in the slave trade.”

Dagher reported that some Libyan rebel leaders were “calling for the expulsion of Tawerghans from the area” and “banning Tawergha natives from ever working, living or sending their children to schools in Misrata.” He added that predominately Tawergha neighborhoods in Misrata had already been emptied. Black Libyans were “gone or in hiding, fearing revenge attacks by Misratans, amid reports of bounties for their capture.”

The rebel commander Ibrahim al-Halbous told the Journal, “Tawergha no longer exists, only Misrata.”

Al-Halbous would later reappear in a report by the Sunday Telegraph (9/11/11), reiterating to the British newspaper, “Tawarga no longer exists.” (When Halbous was injured in September, the New York Times9/20/11—portrayed him sympathetically as a martyr in the heroic fight against Qadhafi. The Halbous brigade has in the years since become an influential militia in Libya.)

Libya7...

Like Dagher, the Telegraph‘s Andrew Gilligan drew attention to the slogan painted on the road between Misrata and Tawergha: “the brigade for purging slaves [and] black skin.”

Gilligan reported from Tawergha, or rather from the remnants of the majority-black town, which he noted had “been emptied of its people, vandalized and partly burned by rebel forces.” A rebel leader said of the dark-skinned residents, “We said if they didn’t go, they would be conquered and imprisoned. Every single one of them has left, and we will never allow them to come back.”

Gilligan noted “a racist undercurrent. Many Tawargas, though neither immigrants nor Gaddafi’s much-ballyhooed African mercenaries, are descended from slaves, and are darker than most Libyans.”

Slavery1...

The North Atlantic Treaty Organization assisted these virulently racist rebels in Misrata. NATO forces frequently launched air attacks on the city. French fighter jets shot down Libyan planes over Misrata. The US and UK fired cruise missiles at Libyan government targets, and the US launched Predator drone strikes. The Canadian air force also attacked Libyan forces, pushing them out of Misrata.

In a public relations video NATO published in May 2011, early in the Libya war, the Western military alliance openly admitted that it intentionally allowed “Libyan rebels to transport arms from Benghazi to Misrata.” Political scientist Micah Zenko (Foreign Policy3/22/16) pointed out the implications of this video: “A NATO surface vessel stationed in the Mediterranean to enforce an arms embargo did exactly the opposite, and NATO was comfortable posting a video demonstrating its hypocrisy.”

Throughout the war and after, Libyan rebels continued carrying out racist sectarian attacks against their black compatriots. These attacks have been well documented by mainstream human rights organizations.

Human Rights Watch’s longtime executive director Kenneth Roth cheered on NATO intervention in Libya in 2011, calling the UN Security Council’s unanimous endorsement of a no-fly zone a “remarkable” confirmation of the so-called “responsibility to protect” doctrine.

Roth’s organization, however, could not ignore the crimes anti-Qadhafi militants committed against dark-skinned Libyans and migrants.

In September 2011, when the war was still ongoing, Human Rights Watch reported on Libyan rebels’ “arbitrary arrests and abuse of African migrant workers and black Libyans assumed to be [pro-Qadhafi] mercenaries.”

Then in October, the top US human rights organization noted that Libyan militias were “terrorizing the displaced residents of the nearby town of Tawergha,” the majority-black community that had been a stronghold of support for Qadhafi. “The entire town of 30,000 people is abandoned—some of it ransacked and burned—and Misrata brigade commanders say the residents of Tawergha should never return,” HRW added. Witnesses “gave credible accounts of some Misrata militias shooting unarmed Tawerghans, and of arbitrary arrests and beatings of Tawerghan detainees, in a few cases leading to death.”

Slavery2..

In 2013, HRW reported further on the ethnic cleansing of the black community of Tawergha. The human rights organization, whose chief had so effusively supported the military intervention, wrote: “The forced displacement of roughly 40,000 people, arbitrary detentions, torture and killings are widespread, systematic and sufficiently organized to be crimes against humanity.”

These atrocities are undeniable, and they lead a path straight to the enslavement of African refugees and migrants. But to acknowledge NATO’s complicity in empowering these racist extremist militants, corporate media would have to acknowledge NATO’s role in the 2011 regime change war in Libya in the first place.

Article by Global Research

Hypocritical racist Trump going after Assata!

Trump....jpg

Donald Trump crying over some cop who has killed a long time ago and trying to get Cuba who has given her refuge to hand them over so she can be prosecuted is pathetic and cowardly. Especially, since Cops who murder African people in the United States of America are routinely found not guilty and left alone to resume their lives.
What kind of man seeks out to bring arrest a 70-year-old woman but allows a War criminal like George W. Bush to roam around freely when he has led to the death of thousands of people. The life of Assata Shakur is worth far more than any police officer.
Whatever happened to Trump’s promise to arrest Hillary Clinton for her crimes against the United States of America. Or how about arresting war criminal George W. Bush. The fact that George W. Bush one of the greatest war criminals in the history of the world is roaming free in the United States proves the ICC and other White institutions are comical.

Assata.....jpg
Donald Trump call to Cuba to illegal detain free Cuban citizen Assata Shakur show lack of respect for the sovereignty of Cuba and undermines global peace. If anything Assata Shakur should be given a Presidential Medal of Freedom for standing up against one of the most racist institutions in the World the USA legal system.

Article by Amos Magazine

Why I will not be seeing Wonder Woman

Black Wonder Woman....jpg

I almost did it. I selected a theatre and even looked up showtimes. As I began to mentally assemble my outfit and rework my schedule to accommodate viewing the film, I realized that I was all too familiar with this story.

Wonder Woman is yet another page in the consistent white female narrative designed to portray white beauty intertwined with an earthly anglicism. I need not see this film to know that it will portray the white Woman as the catalyst for all things good in a “bad” world.

Contrary to the ideally nurtured in the western world, the bad is seldom blatant. Both the individual and the collective have a fair chance at combatting that which they can see. The true “bad” in the world lies in Wonder Woman-like figures, whose embedded message seeks to uplift through depicting the very exclusivity that dominates the western hemisphere.

Wonder Women debuts in a climate that veils this exclusivity with the implication of “change.” Seemingly every film and television series has adopted the feminist agenda, avidly if not aggressively, feeding this fictive utopia to the masses. The film exists to promote feminism as the cure to all worldly evils, omitting of course that feminism is a worldly evil. Clad in a form-fitting costume with long and silky dark hair, Wonder Woman encompasses the conventional sexiness of a blonde with the rarity of a red head to project feminism as the height of femininity. Wonder Woman is a dark haired, dark- eyed white Woman–the pseudo “every woman” in seeming to encompass lightness and darkness simultaneously. What the casual gaze may fail to see, is that Wonder Woman resembles her target audience, and encompasses all her acquired audience wishes to become.  Her dark hair provides a strategic contrast to her fair skin, painting the “Wonder” of wonder woman as encompassing the figurative light to societal conflict or darkness.

The wonder in Wonder Woman is that she embodies the antidote to all the world’s problems. She’s Helen of Troy mixed with Hilary Clinton–a savior to white women but a mortal enemy to the woman of a darker hue.

Cinderella.....

Western childhood functions similar to this film, painting the white Woman as Wonder Woman in far less attractive variants. From the abundant white female school teachers, to the tooth fairy, Mrs. Claus, every princess from Cinderella to Snow White, the white female body is a consistent figure of humanity to the western gaze.  These figures function to embed into the black female psyche what “Superman” and “Batman” seek to implement into the general western psyche–that if you are white, anything is possible.

But as the young girl who reads these stories, attends these schools and watches these figures on television grows up, the fantasy of Wonder Woman vanishes into reality.  Instead the harsh world eventually prompts the once naive black body to wonder what was ever wonderful about these pristine figures of their childhood. Although portrayed as the hero in fictive and real scenarios, the white woman is gradually unveiled as an inevitable villain to the black female body.

So, as a black woman, I know this film functions as erasure. I know this film functions to seduce me into a amnesiac state where I falsely separate white female action and intention from white male supremacists. From the white women who chase our black men than scream rape when it goes sour, or objectify our wealthy black men as cash registers, or reduce the quotidian black man to his genitals, to the white women who abrasively target black women at work, back to the very white women who tormented the black female slaves—this movie functions to force the black psyche to accept a white hero, despite centuries of white female villainy.

White heroes, whether male, female, trans, or what have you, are never capable of saving anyone but themselves. For healing is incompatible to the autocrat, who decorates their lives with the blood of the oppressed.

Wonder Woman

Therefore, the true wonder woman will never occupy a leading role in mainstream film. She probably will never make six figures and is unlikely to rouse a shallow gaze on the street.

The true wonder woman has probably yet to arrive home from her twelve-hour work-day, her twenty-four hour job as a mother, or full- time victim of white supremacy. The true Wonder Woman sleeps at night with a six-figure debt heavy on her conscious from daring to dream outside of the confines of systemic oppression. She walks through a neighborhood of businesses owned by any and everyone but those who look like her. She faces ridicule for her skin tone, her nose, and curvy body and faces countless queries if her beauty or attributes are deemed outside the scope of blackness.  The true wonder woman is literally and figuratively raped, never respected, or rewarded. She is frozen in time, pieces of her flesh still floating throughout the Atlantic Ocean, or concealed in an unmarked grave beneath a skyscraper. She is dismembered by a system who uses her limbs to assemble their privilege and writes their laws in her blood.

She is the unspoken gospel of this poached land—the original statue of liberty—the feminine mold to which every race, ethnicity, and creed stealthy covets.

The Wonder Woman film exists to place the “wonder” into the woman concept. As a being excluded from this concept, I replace wonder with “black.” For the black woman does not need wonder, she is wonder. Furthermore, members of the black female collective need not go to the movies to view this fictive wonder woman—they must simply look in the mirror.

Article by CC Saunders

PizzaGate: Pedophiles,politicians and propaganda

pizzagate1

I’m not sure if many of you have been following the Pizzagate story.  It’s been all over social media.   To be honest I wasn’t even going to do a post about this.  But I had a few subscribers ask me to do a post about it.  I hadn’t really been following the story too much.  But apparently the mainstream media is saying this story about a secret child sex ring is “fake news”.  They say that anyone that believes this story is a crazy conspiracy nut.  I find it funny because the mainstream news is always putting out fake news stories that people believe are true.  Anyway the video(above) breaks the basic synopsis of Pizzagate. I personally believe that many powerful people are sick pedophiles whether they made up this story or not.  It’s just another way of confusing the masses.  They put out the TRUTH but then tell you it’s a LIE.  Just more mind manipulation and a way of controlling your consciousness.

pizzagate2

pizzagate

Here’s a comment by Dr Phil Valentine.  He gives a little insight on the Pizzagate scandal.

“You may be wondering why I referred to these maggots earlier on as the “Pizzaphilia Elite”. Well, that’s based on Wikileaks outing and exposing the child-abuse/child-sacrificing/pederast/cannibal cult that John “Podesta-tha-Molesta”, his brother, the Clintons (i.e.; the video made by the Mossad of Bill allegedly raping a 13 yr old girl on Jeffrey Epstein’s “Orgy Island”, flown there numerous times via his shuttle plane dubbed “The Lolita Express”), and a whole HOST of other sick-f**k “elites” belong to. The exposure of Podesta’s emails and their contents intimating his and others’ involvement in the cult has been dubbed “Pizza-Gate”.

Briefly…here’s why.

To overstanding the meaning of what follows, you have to overstand that there is an underground community of dyed-in-the-wool, “grade A”, EVIL mutha-fukkas who are so steeped in debauchery and the vilest of practice, that NOTHING you could HOPE to conjure up in your WILDEST most horrific nightmares would adequately define them. From the sacrifice and consumption of infants (while other children are forced to watch); the deflowering of girls as young as 4, 5 and 6 years, and the rape of boys the same age; to children being forced to eat their own feces, their own aborted fetuses; actual “Snuff film” rituals being conducted by children…where emptied swimming pools were used as “kill-stations” for human sacrifice because blood could more easily be hosed down and washed away…; and other inhuman atrocities too numerous to articulate here – THESE are the “underground entertainment” choices open to those “initiated” into their blood-and-gut eating cult.

And Podesta’s emails were said to have been the smoking gun that brought this filth to light. In them were written the coded language by which these demons clothed in human form communicated (“off the semantic grid”), their desires and “accomplishments” to one another. Since I am certain those of you reading this are NOT (I sincerely hope not) members of this fetid, bubbling morass of low-life vermin, we were never meant to know what certain “familiar” words meant when placed into contexts that appeared “strange” and even “ridiculous” to us. But that which seems “ridiculous” to us, exemplified what was all-too real to their victims…!

Here are the alleged “Pizza-Gate” code words now used by the “Pizzaphilia Elite” to communicate and brag about their blood and sacrificial exploits to one another. However, because they are being exposed on a daily basis, we can be sure they will be revising their “dictionary of debauchery” in no time. For now, with reference to their child-victims, the follow definitions are alleged to be true…;

1. Pizza = Girl
2. Hot Dog = Boy
3. Cheese = A very young girl
4. Pasta = A very young boy
5. Ice Cream = A Male Prostitute
6. Walnut = (a) Black Boy or Girl (b) Young girl’s genitals
7. Map = Semen
8. Handkerchief = (a) Black = Sado-Masochism
(b) White = Masturbation (?)
9. Pillow = Prostitute
10. Dominos (Domino’s “Pizza”) = Domination
11. Chicken = Young boy

There are many others, but I am not yet aware. Perhaps someone from the Family could add to this list.

pizzagate3

Now; Concerning the symbol and number seen on Podesta’s hands, (above pic) there are a number of plausible theories floating around the web as to their meanings, all of them good, given the fact that these sickos may have their own perverted meanings, such as seen articulated above. Based on my “metaphysical upbringing”, I think these symbols may be best noted as follows.

Briefly, the number “14”, in Kabbalistic terms, represents “love” and “fear”…the 2 most prominent emotions we are supposed to feel while in the “presence” of “God”. However, in THIS sick fuck’s case, I interpret it to mean (in “Satanic”) the “love” OF “fear” … that perverted feeling of “love” he gets from listening to the blood-curdling screams of children suffering in absolute, crippling “fear”. At the point of his committing the blood-ritual, the fear he enlists in the child is the most potent energy he could release and feed on, because HE is “GOD”!

And since it’s all about sexual perversion with these maggots, the number “14” could also signify “Valentine’s Day” – a day used by Satanists to ritualize unbridled sexual lust – the “14th” actually celebrating the 13th day after the “Feast of Imbolg” (Feb. 1st) – 13 representing the Satanic number of “Extreme Rebellion”.

(Incidentally, The moon-th of February is said to have been named after the Roman goddess “Februa” and “St. Febroina” (from the word Febis = “the fever of love”). Or it could just mean that we’re in for some chaotic shit on or around the 14th of this month up to the 14th of next month.

The “Fish” in his other hand could simply be a fish…or more likely, a penis head, the sun, the full moon, with the waning moon as its “tail”.

However, it could also represent the “HAND OF GLORY”…!! (see pic)

In ritual magic, the “Hand of Glory” was actually the hand of a convicted murderer that was severed after his execution, and turned into a talisman of protection that allegedly “froze” or incapacitated anyone, and placed them under your complete control. The hand severed was actually “the hand that committed the murder”, or, “did the deed”.

Judging by Podesta’s hands, he’s been doing the “Spirit Cooking” and “Pain-Eating” ritual (cutting his fingers and or palms to “eat” the pain that ensues, as professed by witch-queen Marina Abramović – see her pic with Jay-Z), while his fish-hand (Hand of Glory) “selfie” is symbolic of him having murdered many (most likely children; perhaps young boys, being that the “fish” is also symbolic of sperm – and the “14” on his other hand being the number of boys killed) and communicating (bragging) which hand he used to “do the deeds”.

There are other hypotheses that I have contemplated, but I will leave it here for now. I’ve worn your eyes out enough. Needless to say, we are witnessing the emergence of a foul, noxious, malodorous stench emanating from the leporic ooze that is the substance of this Parasite’s politics, and we’d better be prepared for what’s coming down the pike. ‘Cause if these demons can achieve orgasms from the screams of terrified children as they torture, murder, and consume these innocents, there is no humanity in them since they are not human. They are the wretched filth regurgitated from some white man’s twisted interpretation of Hell visiting their truest nature upon us; and in time, we too may have to “become as death” to send these bastards back into that hyper-dimensional abyss from whence they emerged…!

Guard well your children beloved family. The “BCW” and other such agencies AROUND THE WORLD were primarily created to supply a steady flow of innocent blood to their sacrificial altars. This they do by manipulation legislation for the sole purpose of destroying families, separating children from their parents, and placing them into the hands of these wretched creatures.”

So is this real?  Are there powerful elites raping children?  Is the story designed to mislead us? The media says it’s fake news.  Keep in mind that the media tells us stories they know are fabricated  and present them as REAL,but also tell us real news and tell us it’s FAKE. Use critical thinking,do your research and come to your own conclusion. Peace.

Is Donald Trump a pedophile rapist?

trump2

trump1

I remember when the WikiLeaks scandal came out there wasn’t much mention of Donald Trump.  He is good friends with rich pedophile Jeffrey Epstein.  Trump was mentioned in those emails they found.  But the mainstream media didn’t seem to mention it.  Epstein is also buddies with the Clintons as well.  I also find it interesting that the media talks about Trump being a racist,sexist and insensitive man…BUT… many haven’t talked about his race case.  I have asked people about it and most don’t know a woman accused him of raping her when she was 13 years old.  The woman said that Trump tied her to a bed and raped her.  She also says that Trump’s buddy Jeffrey Epstein also raped her that night. The federal lawsuit has since been dropped.  Here’s an article about it.

Just a little food for thought.