I’ve actually seen this in person. I can’t control my laughter when I see it.lol
I’ve actually seen this in person. I can’t control my laughter when I see it.lol
Are you transphobic? You might be. If you’re a heterosexual man and you’re not attracted to transgender women….then you are transphobic? Sounds ridiculous right? But that’s what these European social scientists are trying to teach the masses. Last week there was a lot of talk on social media about washed up R&B singer Ginuwine. I saw washed up because he is currently on the UK reality show Celebrity Big Brother. In the video(above) is shows an exchange between Ginuwine and transgender “woman” India Willoughby. India asked him whether he would date “her”. Ginuwine said “Not if you told me you was trans”. India then tried to kiss Ginuwine on the cheek and he pulled away. And the militant transgender community went haywire! They are saying he’s transphobic because he didn’t want to kiss a man. This is a clear sign of insanity! He has every right to reject India. The funny thing is there’s all this talk about sexual harassment against women. All these famous men are being accused of sexual advances against women. But where are these women from the #Metoo movement? Why aren’t they defending Ginuwine? You can’t have it both ways. Wrong is wrong.
I want you to take a good look at this picture(above). Look at all these damn symbols. Why are there so many gender and sexual orientation symbols? Third gender? Pangender? Genderqueer? What the hell is a demigirl? They’re just making up terms now. And the mindless sheep are just going along with it. I’m going to make this plain. There are only TWO genders. I repeat TWO. All this nonsense about third genders and ten different sexual orientations is absolute rubbish! Nothing but gibberish from these demonic people in the media. They use all these big words to confuse everyone. I call it articulate nonsense. Nothing but uneducated fools. This is not the way of African people. This is anti-life and anti-nature. It goes against the ways of our ancestors. This is not good for the black community. This is European pseudoscience garbage! And should be rejected anytime you see it.
This picture(above) is the Gender Unicorn. This is a carton character that teaches children about the gender identity. You’ll notice on the chart that it says “sex assigned at birth” Assigned?? You are born a boy or girl. You are NOT assigned a gender! And this is the sick agenda at hand. They want to start confusing children at a very early age. The next generation will see transgender people as just a normal lifestyle. They’ve already normalized homosexuals and lesbian. So transgenders are the next logical step. There is a concerted effort to make sexual perversion seen as normal. We must protect black children from this onslaught on their young minds. In African culture we understand the importance of masculine and feminine energy. We know that in Maat there has to be balance. Men are seen as the provider,protector and comforter to his woman and children. The women are valued as great mothers,teachers and being great spiritual figures. But this wicked European culture wants to destroy all of that. They want to create chaos and destroy the natural order of things. And to do that they must create confusion so they people can not get in tune with nature and their natural selves. They want to annihilate the divine masculine and feminine principles. And we can’t allow that to happen.
I love this video(above). It’s a video clip of R&B singer Bobby Brown putting some homosexual in check! It looks like an old reality show from a few years ago. Say what you want about Brown but I give him major props for this. He was about to beat give this man a serious beating. And I can’t say I blame him. These homosexuals think they’re so funny making advances at straight men. But they wont be laughing after their teeth get punched in. And the media wants all black men to be seen as soft and feminine. This is a clear attack on black manhood. And the #Metoo movement is supporting a double standard. If it’s wrong for a man to make unwanted sexual advances to a woman…then it should be wrong for a transgender person or gay man to make unwanted sexual advances towards a straight man. What is so complicated about that? The definition of transphobic is a “person with an irrational fear or hostility towards people who are transgender,or who otherwise transgress traditional gender norms”. Well I’m not afraid of them. I just prefer to date real women. I’m attracted to women that were born women. I love the way women walk,talk and smell. I love the softness of their bodies. Does that make me a bad person? I have a right to like what I want. Here’s the truth about this agenda. These sick social scientists want to disrupt nature. They know that they’re only two genders. But they want to change the definition of everything. These transgender “women” want to be seen as real women. And they are offended if you don’t view them as such. Well that’s too bad. They can’t change reality. If you’re born a man you can change your penis to a vagina and get breast implants…..but biologically you’re still a man. And I don’t care what any so-called sexual psychologist,therapist or celebrity has to say about it. If that makes me transphobic…..then so be it.
Take a real good look at this person. This is a black man. Or is it? Well I guess it depends on who you ask. This person on the cover of Metro Weekly is Janet Mock. The tagline on the magazine says “mighty real”. Which is very misleading since there is not much real when looking at this cover. You see Janet Mock was born a man. Which means he has a penis. As far as I know he hasn’t had his penis removed so he’s still a man. But that’s my definition. But according to this deranged European culture I’m living in I’m supposed to call him a woman. But isn’t Janet just a man in a dress? If I put on an astronaut suit does it make me an astronaut? If I paint myself white does it make me a white man? I wouldn’t think so. But the fact they we have to call these people a certain gender because it’s what they “feel” like shows you we are way off course. We have really lost our minds.
And what’s really scary is that more and more black people are accepting this false reality. One of the most popular men in this transgender movement is Laverne Cox(pic above). Cox has been on numerous mainstream magazine covers. He’s been on so many I’ve lost count. Covers that many authentic black women have never been on. Why is that? Is the racist white media trying to redefine black womanhood? Are they trying to portray black women as more masculine by having men imitate them? Sure looks like it to me. I think it’s a way to destroy the divine feminine principle. It seems like a combination of both sexism and racism. In a way it’s an insult to both black men and women. Are they trying to get rid of black alpha males? This is really sick and twisted!
Then we have actor Amiyah Scott. Amiyah is on the drama Star. Star is produced by well known homosexual Lee Daniels. Much like his other show Empire,Star is full of masculine lesbians,homosexuals,transgenders,violence,crime and interracial sex. All the things Daniels loves to portray as normal for the black community. By having more transgenders on network television it normalizes it. Which is the purpose in my view.
I don’t really follow the transgender/homosexual culture so I never knew about this. But they actually have transgender contests. It’s really big in Atlanta. The video(above) is a contest in which men compete to see who looks the most like a woman. It’s called the “I AM BALL” contest. I could tell they were all men so I don’t know how the hell you pick a winner.
Not to be left out but they also have a competition for a female to male transition. This is were females compete to see who looks the most like a man. This is really crazy to watch. I can’t believe they actually have a contest for this type of thing. What the hell is going on in Atlanta? I thought it was knows as “Black Mecca”. Is this what our people are now embracing?
Chimamanda Ngozi Adiche is a Nigerian writer of novels and short stories. In the video(above) she says that you can’t compare the struggles of women that were born women with transwomen. She says that it’s not the same thing because they have been women since birth. Just so you know the term being used today is cisgender. You will hear terms like cis male or cis female. Which means “male assigned male at birth”. Assigned?? I thought that you are whatever you were at birth. But you see how they’re making up all these terms to confuse us. Well at any rate Adiche was attacked by actor Laverne Cox. Cox disagreed with Adiche’s statement. Although she didn’t address Adiche directly,here’s the statement by Cox:
“I was talking to my twin brother today about whether he believes I had male privilege growing up. I was a very feminine child though I was assigned male at birth. My gender was constantly policed. I was told I acted like a girl and was bullied and shamed for that. My femininity did not make me feel privileged. I was a good student and was very much encouraged because of that but I saw cis girls who showed academic promise being nurtured in the black community I grew up in in Mobile, Ala. Gender exists on a spectrum & the binary narrative which suggests that all trans women transition from male privilege erases a lot of experiences and isn’t intersectional. Gender is constituted differently based on the culture we live in. There’s no universal experience of gender, of womanhood. To suggest that is essentialist & again not intersectional. Many of our feminist foremothers cautioned against such essentialism & not having an intersectional approach to feminism. Class, race, sexuality, ability, immigration status, education all influence the ways in which we experience privilege so though I was assigned male at birth I would contend that I did not enjoy male privilege prior to my transition. Patriarchy and cissexism punished my femininity and gender nonconformity. The irony of my life is prior to transition I was called a girl and after I am often called a man. Gender policing & the fact that gender binaries can only exist through strict policing complicates the concept of gendered privilege & that’s OK cause it’s complicated. Intersectionality complicates both male and cis privilege. This is why it is paramount that we continue to lift up diverse trans stories. For too many years there’s been far too few trans stories in the media. For over 60 years since Christine Jorgensen stepped off the plane from Europe and became the first internationally known trans woman the narrative about trans folks in the media was one of macho guy becomes a woman. That’s certainly not my story or the stories of many trans folks I know. That narrative often works to reinforce binaries rather than explode them. That explosion is the gender revolution I imagine,one of true gender self determination.”
What was this garbage? This Cox character has lost his mind! All this talk of gender policing and gender binaries is total nonsense. He was assigned male at birth because he is a MAN. It’s just that simple. All these terms are just going to confuse the younger generation. They will see homosexuals,lesbians and transgenders as just normal behavior. This is why men like Cox,Janet Mock and Amiyah Scott are given books and television appearances.
This is another reason people are debating gender neutral restrooms. Why is this even a debate? A man in a dress should not be able to go into a women’s restroom. There are little girls in there. No one wants a man pretending to be a woman in a women’s restrooms. And I don’t think most men would want a transgender men in a men’s restroom. This shows you how sick European culture has become. It is going right down the toilet. And this is all by design. And this is a serious issue for black people because we live among them. It is destroying how we view sexuality and womanhood. As I said before I think it’s a way of redefining black womanhood. And to destroy the divine feminine principle. I hope black people are paying attention. We are truly living in Hell.
This little white boy is nine year old Avery Jackson. He/she has made history. Avery is the first transgender child on the cover of National Geographic. He has lived as an openly transgender girl since age five. This is very unsettling to see. This proves that European culture wants to permanently damage the minds of children. This is not normal behavior.
This is sexual perversion at it’s finest. This video(above) is proof. This is just more European antics.
I want you to take a good hard look at the woman in this picture. Some people want to claim her as a black woman. Are you a bit confused? You’re not alone. She is an actress by the name of Shailene Woodley. There’s a lot of hype about her right now. She is the star of the Divergent films series. The second installment comes out later this week called Insurgent. While was looking on the internet last week I came across an article about this actress. There were an article stating that Woodley was of African descent. I thought this was a joke at first and it peaked my interest. As I did a little investigating I found some sites that said her great-great grand parents may have been of Creole descent. And of course all the white racists were having a fit! They were not happy that their beautiful white starlet may be tainted with black blood! Heaven forbid! I found out that most of her so called “African lineage” was on her mother’s side. I found a bio about her which states:
“Shailene’s father has English ancestry. Shailene’s maternal grandfather had African-American ancestry, and Shailene’s maternal grandmother has Louisiana Creole (including African, French, Spanish, and German) ancestry on one side of her family, and English and Swiss ancestry on the other side of her family.Shailene’s paternal grandparents were Virgil James Woodley and Dovie Oralee Sims (the daughter of Omer Epsy Sims and Eva Ellen Payne). Virgil was born in Oklahoma. Dovie was born in Texas. Their families had been in the United States for many generations, and had English ancestry.Shailene’s maternal grandfather was Stephen David Victor (the son of Harold Victor and Bessie Harrold). According to most censuses, both Harold and Bessie were Black and/or biracial (censuses list Harold and Bessie as black, and one census lists them as “Mulatto”). Harold was from Louisiana. Bessie was born in California, to Texas-born parents, William John Harrold and Bessie Hutchins.Shailene’s maternal grandmother is Diane Lynn Fauria (the daughter of Vernon Louis Fauria and Marguerite Lois Davis). Vernon was a Louisiana Creole. Maguerite was Caucasian.Both of Vernon Fauria’s parents had black ancestry, mixed with caucasian. Vernon’s father, Joseph Mathews Fauria, was of African, Spanish, French, and German descent. Vernon’s mother, Aline Louise Martinez, had Spanish, African, and possibly French, ancestry. Maguerite Davis’s father, Norman E. Davis, was likely of British Isles/English ancestry. Maguerite’s mother, Shailene’s maternal great-great-grandmother, Evangeline Perinjacket, was the daughter of Swiss immigrants. This makes Shailene Woodley of 1/16th Swiss ancestry.”
This picture is her great grand parents Vernon Fauria and Maguerite Davis. Vernon looks like he could be a mulatto or maybe Italian at best. But neither grandparent looks very black to me.
Here’s another picture of her great-great grand parents. How many of them look really black to you? Not too many from my viewpoint. So what is Shailene then? 1/48 black? 1/25 black? I have no idea. I was never good at fractions. Whatever black she has in her it must be very small.This issue is much bigger than Ms Woodley. This issue goes back to the “one drop” rule. It was a system set up by the white power structure during slavery. It’s an issue that wont seem to go away. I have seen many black people attach themselves to celebrities that don’t look very black in my opinion. This madness has to stop. It begs the question. Who is Black? Who is African? Should we accept anyone who has the smallest bit of “black blood” as one of our own?
Is actor Vin Diesel black? His mother is white but he says he never knew his father. He wants to be called “racially ambiguous”. What the hell does that mean? Does having a colorblind mindset help to end racism?
What about actor Wentworth Miller? Is this a black man? He speaks out about racism from time to time? Does that qualify him to be a black man. His bio says his racial makeup is Dutch,African American,Jewish,Swedish,Syrian,German,French,Lebanese and Russian! Whew!!! Did you get all that? Okay so what is he?
Actress Rebecca Hall is Dutch,African American and Sioux. Which makes her about 1/8 black. Say what you want be she has more African ancestry than Shailene Woodley and Wentworth Miller put together. The reality is there are a lot of people of mixed race nowadays. And black people have so few heroes that we want to be able to see people that represent us. That’s only natural. But I think they should at least look somewhat black. I think when you have people claiming that the Wentworth Miller’s of the world are black…..it can cause a whole lot of confusion. They should be called what they are…biracial or mixed. I don’t mean to offend anyone at all. That is not my intention. I just think that calling mixed raced people, African or black doesn’t help fight white supremacy. If we want to really move forward as a people and end racism we need some clarification on who is black and who is not. All this talk about “post racial America”,”colorblindness” and “we are all mixed” is nonsense. We have to deal with the REAL world. There are social and class divisions. But the racial divide is the biggest of them all.
Here’s a post by blogger Lumumba Afrika. He makes some very valid points on this very topic.
“It took me a year to finally accept this conclusion. I had an argument with a YouTuber concerning this issue in reference to a video he posted entitled “Just because you got black in you.” He proceeded to say that racially mixed people (i.e. people with parents from two distinctly different racial groups with one being Black/Afrikan) are not Afrikan and I predictably had an emotional argument referencing the systematic rape that occurred to Afrikans perpetrated by whites (Europeans) in the USA which resulted in the wider spectrum of skin colour seen in the Afrikan population in the US today. However, after failing to convince him and unsubscribing from his channel, I had several months to listen to interviews and read a lot of material, historical, biological, sociological, and political. I eventually reached the conclusion that indeed he is correct. Hybridized people are not Afrikan and should not be accepted as such.
Before you throw around the term “racist”, let me define the term as per my understanding, The terms “racism” and “racist” are actually misnomers. The phenomena should more accurately be termed “ethnocentric economic protectionism for the purposes of seeking, securing and wielding wealth and power”. Understandably, with this more accurate term, it is more convenient for the “racists” to use the former terminology because it deftly conceals the true nature of the phenomenon and makes confused, naive, and unsuspecting people believe that “anyone can be racist” because they treat someone of another race or more appropriately termed “geno-cultural group”, rudely or make disparaging comments about them. Moreover, the more academically accepted terms “white supremacists” and “white supremacy” are actually not a correct terms either, although from a eurocentric point of view these terms do surreptitiously stimulate the “utamaroho” (Ani, 1994), of Europeans and people classified as white, these terms are nevertheless used to describe the phenomenon in critical race theory and other fields of study. The appropriate terms are actually either “white world domination by terror” (Kambon, 2006) or “white hegemony”. This is an ideology that holds that whites are better, smarter, and more capable producers and managers of wealth than non-white people, and specifically those categorised as black. Hence it justifies by any means necessary the total destruction of any successful model of development independent of whites or without white people leading, organising and directing it. The logic of this racial hierarchical model proceeds downward with each racial group being more adept at this activity than the lower caste. This ideology informs the system of “white supremacy” that is presently masquerading as globalism. Therefore, it is impossible for a non-white victim (and especially Afrikans) of this system to be a racist, practice racism, be a white supremacist, white hegemonist, or participate in white ethnocentric economic protectionism or “white world domination by terror” in any way that ultimately benefits his or her existence within his or her geno-cultural group and the group as a whole entity as such.
So back to why mulattoes are not Afrikan. Firstly, I would like to posit the view that mulattoes are genome terminator entities, meaning that they can’t reproduce themselves like their respective parents can if they had have mated with one of their own geno-cultural group. A mulatto must mate with another mulatto to reproduce themselves or else their offspring reverts back towards whichever geno-cultural group they have chosen to mate with or they create another hybridised offspring should they decide to mate with another hybridised person or someone from a geno-cultural group which is not one of their parents. Hence their genome pattern cannot maintain structural integrity and they terminate. This is actually the strongest argument for why mulattoes are not Afrikan. Every other geno-cultural group on the planet knows this including the hybridised groups such as the Arabs. The Hispanic/Latinos are another matter which I will address later. I won’t discuss the Indians of South Asia (see the talk by Dr. Velu Annamalai – “Dali: The Black Untouchables of India” on YouTube) but one could reasonably compare my discussion below of the Hispanic/Latinos with that of the Indians, although it is not entirely the same. Other geno-cultural groups never accept a hybrid as one of them. This DOES NOT mean that they treat the hybrid unkindly or should do so in all cases, nor does it mean that the hybrid cannot participate in economic or educational opportunities. However, at the level of strategic power in which the lives and destiny of the geno-cultural group are at stake, hybrids have no place, no relevant voice in matters such as these as they are not part of the geno-cultural group’s GENETIC survival. This is an error that Afrikan people have made. They have assumed that because of “racist” practices of other geno-cultural groups to cast off their hybrids among us, even when they have been created but not fully accepted among the ranks of others, and furthermore the other groups made rules about why they have done so, (i.e. the one drop rule), we have felt an obligation to accept them which has resulted in a non-exclusive preachment befalling the Afrikan geno-cultural group. This failure to address who is Afrikan and who is not has left us vulnerable to infiltration, not only by hybrids, but by non-Afrikans under the false claim that they are too Afrikan because they were either born on the Afrikan continent, they have some distant ancestor who participated in or was raped into producing a hybrid, or they cling to an as yet unproven theory of the “out of Afrika hypothesis” of human origin founded with the propagation of Darwin’s THEORY of evolution. This has left Afrikan people without a codified set of standards, rules and regulations about who is an Afrikan and has exposed us to confused mulattoes seeking a constituency and other unscrupulous interlopers seeking to dominate us.
It was part of racist practices of our enemies to create a one-drop rule. White men did it so they wouldn’t have to legally and formally acknowledge the offspring they had as a result of raping Afrikan women and mulattoes. In fact, I would submit that non-Afrikans who pursue sexual relations with Afrikan people are practicing ethnocentric economic protectionism by way of furthering the social hegemonic aspect of this system, albeit it in a vulgar, perverted, and insidiously biologically destructive way. These people know full well that at present Afrikan people are the least respected geno-cultural group on the planet, so they are seeking to fulfill a need to feel superior to someone through a sexual encounter (which is one of the most vulnerable situations, psychologically and spiritually, a victim of this assault can engage in) which is done most likely due to a sense of inferiority in the non-Afrikan’s own geno-cultural group, or the perpetrators are inherently lustful and perverted and seek to satisfy carnal sexual fetishes at the expense of the non-geno-cultural other, in this case the Afrikan.The Afrikan geno-cultural group is under no obligation through this behaviour to “accept” mulatto offspring as part of our geno-cultural group anymore than other geno-cultures. It is due to our relative powerlessness and refusal to strictly define who is an Afrikan that has lead to this confusion. Afrikans as part of our liberation and industrial renaissance of Afrikan civilisation, must codify and institutionalise a valid definition of who is an Afrikan. I would suggest reading Chinweizu’s discussion of the “mirror test” for some insight into this matter.”
I think Lumumba has thought about this subject long and hard. It’s a very touchy subject for many people. But a subject that I felt needed to be addressed.
So we can stop foolishness like in this pic. And just in case anyone is still confused…Shailene is a white woman.